

Would you rent a house you have not seen the inside of? I think if it was an older property, and didn't look well maintained I would say no, but look at these two homes. They are cute, new and well maintained so in our situation I would say, yes, but Brody still says, no way. The home I am most interested in is only 3 years old and had only one previous tenant, which was a single older lady. Since there is someone currently living in it the owner is not comfortable letting me have someone go through and take pictures of the inside to email me. She doesn't have any pictures online because she's a little older and not current with technology, so she's kinda old fashion but still very professional. The property owner allows no pets and no smoking. The interior has high ceilings, italian tile throughout main rooms, bathrooms and kitchen, carpeted bedrooms, neutral paint, french doors leading to a patio, backyard, and storage. This house is also in the nicest part of town. It is only 3/4 mile to church and 2 miles to Brody's work. I can tell by talking to the owner on the phone that she is very passionate about her properties. They are very nice, and before I would move in she would personally go through with professional cleaners and maintenance and make sure everything was in perfect condition. I would be able to go through the home before I signed the lease and even have someone go through and take pictures at the end of the month when the tenant moves out, but by then my other rental options would not be available anymore. Would you rent a house without seeing the inside?